Beauty treatment lawyer, Carly Sylvester, wins another claim
Speak to specialist lawyer, Carly Sylvester, about your beauty treatment claim. Contact her for a free case assessment and details of no win, no fee funding.
Beauty treatment lawyer, Carly Sylvester, has recently notched up another success, recovering compensation on behalf of Mrs E in relation to a thread vein claim.
Ms E had consulted a beauty clinic for thread vein removal treatment on her face. She was given a patch test and was advised to come back for an appointment in one month’s time.
When she attended the appointment, Ms E enquired about the possibility of treating the veins on her legs instead of her face as she had noticed the development of some broken capillaries. The beautician agreed to use the appointment to treat her legs.
When the treatment commenced Ms E noticed that the beautician was using a different machine to the one she had been patch tested for. As the treatment progressed Ms E repeatedly told the beautician that she was experiencing a burning sensation to her legs. However, she was assured by the practitioner that this was entirely normal.
Towards the end of the session the beautician indicated that the appointment had overrun and Ms E was rushed out of the clinic without an opportunity to properly inspect the treated areas.
Throughout the remainder of the day, Ms E experienced pain in her legs, and when she finally had the opportunity to examine them, she noticed that she had begun to develop blisters.
Ms E approached Slee Blackwell Solicitors, and after a free consultation with beauty treatment lawyer Carly Sylvester, she was told that we would be happy to assist her in claiming compensation on a No Win, No Fee basis.
A claim was therefore submitted to the beauty clinic. Although they initially denied legal liability they soon realised that they would have to compensate our client. In addition to their failure to patch test our client specifically for the machine that was used we also established that the beautician had operated it at a higher setting than recommended, and this had contributed to Mrs E suffering injury.
Consequently we were able to negotiate a very favourable out of court settlement of our client’s negligent beauty treatment claim.